WikiLeaks and its editor-in-chief, Julian Assange, have come under attack from US officials and their allies for potentially endangering informants and troops in Afghanistan by posting the texts of thousands of leaked war logs.
The US defence secretary, Robert Gates, claimed in
Washington: "The battlefield consequences are potentially severe and
dangerous for our troops, our allies and Afghan partners, and may well damage
our relationships and reputation in that key part of the world."
Gates said sensitive intelligence which could endanger
informants had been widely distributed down to junior level in the US army, in
a loose policy which might now have to be reconsidered.
"We endeavour to push access to sensitive
battlefield information down to where it is most useful – on the front lines –
where as a practical matter there are fewer restrictions and controls than at
rear headquarters," he said. "In the wake of this incident, it will
be a real challenge to strike the right balance between security and providing
our frontline troops the information they need."
Admiral Mike Mullen, who chairs the joint chiefs of
staff, said: "Mr Assange can say whatever he likes about the greater good
he thinks he and his source are doing, but the truth is they might already have
on their hands the blood of some young soldier or that of an Afghan
family."
The Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, called the disclosure
of the names of Afghans who had co-operated with Nato and US forces
"irresponsible and shocking". He said in Kabul: "Whether those
individuals acted legitimately or illegitimately in providing information to
the Nato forces, their lives will be in danger."
WikiLeaks withheld some 15, 000 intelligence reports to
protect informants. But some of the posted texts contain details of Afghans who
have dealt with the coalition.
Assange said today that they had tried to comply with a
private White House request to redact the names of informants before
publication. But the US authorities had refused to assist them.
He said in a statement: "Secretary Gates speaks
about hypothetical blood, but the grounds of Iraq and Afghanistan are covered
with real blood."
Thousands of children and adults had been killed and the
US could have announced a broad inquiry into these killings, "but he
decided to treat these issues with contempt''.
He said: "This behaviour is unacceptable. We will
continue to expose abuses by this administration and others."
Meanwhile, both US and UK authorities remained silent
about the disclosures in the 92,000 war log files that hundreds of civilians
have been killed or wounded by coalition forces in unreported or previously
under-reported incidents. The Ministry of Defence withdrew promises to make an
official statement about US allegations that two units of British troops had
caused exceptional loss of civilian life.
MoD sources said that at least 15 of the 21 alleged cases
had now been confirmed, but they were unable to say what investigations had
subsequently taken place, or when they would now make a statement.
A detachment of the Coldstream Guards was newly arrived
in Kabul when innocent civilians were shot on four separate occasions in
October-November 2007.
Several different companies of Royal Marine commands are
alleged to have shot civilians who came "too close" to convoys or
patrols on eight occasions in Helmand province during the six-month period
ending in March 2008.
Sources said that the then Labour foreign secretary,
David Miliband, was so concerned about civilian deaths that he helped push
forward a UN resolution in 2008, setting up an UN system to monitor such
casualties.
But it does not function effectively, according to the
independent Human Rights Watch. The United Nations Assistance Mission in
Afghanistan reported 828 civilian deaths in 2008, thanks to
"pro-government forces", saying force protection incidents, "are
of continuing concern", where innocent drivers, car passengers or
motorcyclists, are shot by passing troops.
The US authorities are concentrating their firepower on
leakers and their friends. Gates said the FBI had been called in to widen the
criminal investigation into Private Bradley Manning, who is in military custody
charged with leaking a classified video showing Apache pilots gunning down two
Reuters cameramen in Baghdad who they believed might be insurgents.
Manning is being moved from a military jail in Kuwait to
Qauntico, Maryland, and the FBI will now be able to investigate civilians such
as Assange, for possible conspiracy offences. Assange's whereabouts were
unknown today.