Why are they trying to foist the most ethically challenged candidate on a party still in therapy after eight years of Mr. Clinton, his "bimbo eruptions," sleezy Chinese financial backers and the smelled-to-high-heaven pardon of union-buster Mark Rich? (See http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0212-04.htm).      

Did they ask her what roles will her brothers, Tony and Hugh Rodham, play in her administration? Tony helped gain a presidential pardon for a Tennessee couple convicted of bank fraud. Hugh pocketed $400,000 in legal fees after two of his clients were granted last-minute pardons.

One, Carlos Vignali Jr., was convicted for transporting 800 pounds of cocaine; and his pardon was granted against the wishes of the Justice Department.   President Jimmy Carter's chief of staff Hamilton Jordan called the Clintons our "First Grifters"?   Why visit this upon us again?

Posted by: Martinedwinandersen | December 15, 2007 10:58 PM  

MartinEdwinAndersen wrote: P.S. After I served as Senate Majority Whip Alan Cranston's foreign policy advisor, I worked as a senior advisor for policy planning in the Criminal Division of Janet Reno's Justice Department. There I won the federal service's highest award as a national security whistleblower by shedding light on how top Reno aides--including the one she had just appointed to "clean up" the Immigration and Naturalization Service--were, according to the Department IG, guilty of "egregious misconduct" and "willful disregard for national security," including trying to arrange fraudulent visas for Russian women, one of whom the seniormost Reno aide (the one supposed to "clean up" the INS) involved the scandal was sleeping with. (http://foi.missouri.edu/whistleblowing/commentary.html).  

As they say in Spanish, the fish rots from the head.  

Sign me,

A Heritage Democrat
12/15/2007 9:41:17 PM